Human approval
AI supports review work. Engineers decide, approve, reject, or escalate recommendations.
Trust and responsible AI
GridAPM Ai is designed for evidence, planning, and reporting workflows where security, explainability, operational boundaries, and engineering accountability matter.
Principles
GridAPM Ai should make it easier to review what happened, which evidence was used, which assumptions mattered, and which person approved the next action.
AI supports review work. Engineers decide, approve, reject, or escalate recommendations.
GridAPM Ai is positioned for evidence, planning, and reporting workflows, not autonomous transformer control.
Recommendations should link back to source records, assumptions, uncertainty, and review state.
Evaluation can begin with approved datasets and offline-first workflows before broader integration.
Pilot scope should use only the evidence needed to evaluate the agreed workflow.
Agent activity should be logged with rationale, inputs, outputs, and human signoff.
Governance model
A controlled pilot should clarify data, agent, decision, and audit boundaries before expanding into broader enterprise workflows.
Trust FAQ
No. GridAPM Ai is positioned as human-reviewed APM decision support for evidence organization, reasoning support, recommendation drafting, and reporting.
A pilot can be scoped around approved datasets and controlled workflows. Deployment details should be reviewed with each operator's security and operational technology requirements.
The product direction emphasizes bounded agent tasks, visible evidence, uncertainty notes, human approval, audit trails, and conservative claims.