Synthetic evidence demo
Transformer evidence pack with a visible review trail.
This synthetic demo shows how approved transformer evidence can move from source inventory to quality review, AI draft, engineer approval, and an audit-ready evidence pack. It is not diagnostic advice and does not represent a real asset.
Synthetic TX-47 74/100
Evidence readiness score
High readiness for structured pilot review
Sample status only. Scores and evidence values are illustrative and not tied to a real transformer.
Asset context
Synthetic profile for a controlled review package.
A real pilot would replace every value below with approved customer evidence, source links, reviewer ownership, and retention expectations agreed in advance.
DGA and oil evidence snapshot
| Signal | Latest synthetic value | Trend note | Review state |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrogen | 96 ppm | +18 ppm / 90 days | Watch |
| Methane | 42 ppm | +7 ppm / 90 days | Stable-watch |
| Ethylene | 8 ppm | +1 ppm / 90 days | Stable |
| Acetylene | 0 ppm | No detected movement | Stable |
| Moisture | 19 ppm | Stable after oil service | Stable |
Evidence readiness matrix
What reviewers can inspect before trusting the package.
The matrix separates evidence availability from final condition judgment. GridAPM should help surface gaps, not hide them.
| Evidence area | Synthetic source material | Readiness | Reviewer note |
|---|---|---|---|
| DGA and oil | Recent lab reports, method notes, units | Reviewable | Trend needs continued watch |
| PRPD | Pattern export, channel context, noise notes | Partial | Add test setup notes |
| SFRA | Baseline and latest comparison | Reviewable | Confirm bushing configuration notes |
| Thermal/loading | Loading profile, ambient, cooling state | Reviewable | Add hot-spot assumption owner |
| Maintenance history | Oil service, inspection notes, work orders | Reviewable | Close one follow-up action |
| Approval path | Asset engineer, maintenance planner, reliability owner | Ready | Define escalation threshold |
Controlled AI workflow
Evidence moves forward only after human review.
The AI draft can organize evidence and ask review questions, but the decision record remains owned by qualified reviewers.
- 1. Evidence imported Source files registered with synthetic provenance labels
- 2. Quality review Units, dates, asset identity, and missing notes checked
- 3. AI draft Draft summary created with watch items and open questions
- 4. Engineer review Draft edited; PRPD and thermal assumptions kept as watch items
- 5. Evidence pack Human-reviewed package marked ready for pilot discussion
Export pack
What a pilot team can ask GridAPM to prepare.
A production pilot should define the export format, approval states, evidence retention, and the handoff path to maintenance, asset management, reliability, procurement, or governance teams.
Source evidence inventory
DGA trend summary
PRPD measurement-quality note
SFRA comparison note
Thermal/loading context
Maintenance history extract
AI draft rationale with reviewer edits
Approval and exception log