Topic hub
Human-Reviewed AI for Critical Infrastructure
Why critical infrastructure AI needs bounded agents, traceable evidence, human approval, responsible governance, and audit-ready decision records.
Human-reviewed AI for critical infrastructure keeps engineers in control while AI agents organize evidence, surface risks, draft recommendations, preserve uncertainty, and create audit-ready records.
Curated resources
Where to start.
A short, hand-picked path into this topic: guides, interactive tools, and solution pages.
Guide
Human-in-the-Loop AI
The case for approval gates in high-consequence engineering decisions.
Guide
Audit Trails for Human-Reviewed Transformer AI
What a defensible AI audit record contains, entry by entry.
Interactive tool
OT AI risk register builder
Draft a risk register for AI touching operational technology.
Standard
NIST AI RMF reference
The governance framework GridAPM references — context, not certification.
Reference
Trust and AI governance
How review gates, provenance, and audit records govern the agents.
Buyer path
From research topic to pilot workflow.
Each topic should connect to a practical GridAPM evaluation: which evidence is available, which decision is hard today, who reviews the recommendation, and what output the team needs to trust.
- Intake
- Correlate & quality gate
- Agent reasoning
- Engineer sign-off
- Work package & report
Platform architecture
See modules, agents, evidence model, health index, lifecycle context, and reporting.
Data readiness
Map DGA, PRPD, SFRA, thermal, inspection, maintenance, historian, and enterprise data.
Pilot evaluation
Define scope, evidence inputs, timeline, success metrics, and deliverables.
FAQ
Questions buyers actually ask.
What does "human-reviewed" mean concretely, not as a slogan?
Every AI draft carries its cited sources and stays in a review state until a named engineer approves, edits, rejects, or escalates it. The approval, the reviewer identity, and any edits enter the audit record — nothing becomes reportable without that gate.
Doesn't a mandatory review gate slow the team down?
It moves the time, rather than adding it. Engineers already review maintenance decisions; the gate replaces hunting through files with reviewing a pre-assembled, source-linked draft. The pilot measures exactly that: preparation effort before versus after.
Test the workflow on your own fleet.
An eight-week pilot runs on your approved evidence, with your engineers keeping sign-off authority at every step.