Utility Data Contract Mapper

Map whether CIM, IEC 61850, CMMS/EAM, historian, SCADA/EMS, and transformer evidence sources are ready for a bounded agentic AI data-contract pilot.

Data contract Audience: Utility integration, asset, operations, security, and data-governance teams Output: Data-contract pilot map Tool inputs stay in your browser. Optional site analytics, when accepted, records page-level usage only.

Utility Data Contract Mapper

Scope a client-only data-contract plan for agentic AI across CIM, IEC 61850, CMMS/EAM, historian, SCADA/EMS, and OT/data boundary contexts.

Client-only. No uploads or server submission; tool inputs stay local.

Contract inputs

Select generic context only. Do not enter asset IDs, tag names, customer data, credentials, network details, or live operating information.

Data-contract readiness result

62% Focused data-contract pilot

The source landscape has enough structure for a focused data-contract pilot, but missing controls should limit the first scope.

Suggested first pilot scope

CMMS/EAM work-order export contract with source ownership, redaction, and review states

Top missing gaps

    Data-contract workflow

    1. SourceApproved exports, views, models, or evidence streams with owners.
    2. ContractFields, units, provenance, permissions, sensitivity, and mapping rules.
    3. AI draftAgentic AI drafts summaries, gaps, questions, and contract change proposals.
    4. Human reviewQualified reviewers approve, edit, reject, freeze, or escalate outputs.
    5. Evidence packTraceable package with sources, reviewer actions, gaps, and success metric.

    Contract boundary comparison

    Boundary Contract question Human control point
    OT and SCADA/EMS Which read-only views, replicas, or exports can safely ground AI drafts without live-control access? OT, cyber, and operations reviewers approve boundary, redaction, and no-write-back rules.
    CIM and IEC 61850 Which model classes, logical nodes, mappings, and local exceptions are relevant to the pilot? Engineering and data reviewers approve mappings before any contract is treated as reusable.
    CMMS/EAM and historian Which work-order, tag, alarm, event, timestamp, unit, and provenance fields belong in scope? Source owners and maintainers validate field meaning, quality gaps, and success metrics.

    This mapper is a public client-only planning aid: no uploads and no server submission; tool inputs stay local. Optional site analytics, when accepted, does not receive selected tool values. It is not an integration certification, data-migration plan, IEC/CIM certification, SCADA/control connector, diagnostic advice, or autonomous operational authority.

    Use the result as a review-starting point.

    Public tool outputs are designed to help utility, TSO, DSO, generation, data center, oil and gas, and industrial teams frame a controlled GridAPM discussion before approved evidence enters a local-first transformer APM workflow.

    No diagnostic authority The tool does not determine transformer condition, approve maintenance, certify standards compliance, or replace qualified engineering judgment.
    No private source intake Do not enter confidential asset names, work-order IDs, network details, customer data, or proprietary measurements into public planning tools.
    Human review remains central GridAPM positions AI draft output as review material until authorized reviewers approve, edit, reject, or escalate it.

    Turn the tool output into a pilot conversation.

    Share the non-confidential result with GridAPM to discuss approved evidence sources, security boundaries, reviewer ownership, and a measurable first workflow.

    Define approved source evidence
    Name reviewer roles and approval states
    Confirm security and data handling expectations
    Select a measurable first workflow

    Continue scoping the pilot surface.

    These adjacent tools help convert readiness, evidence gaps, governance questions, and handoff fields into a stronger pilot brief.