DGA evidence
IEEE C57.104 for DGA Evidence in Transformer APM
How transformer teams can treat IEEE C57.104 as a dissolved gas analysis reference when preparing traceable, human-reviewed GridAPM pilot evidence.
Why it matters
Use standards context to improve evidence quality.
Dissolved gas analysis is one of the most common evidence streams used to review power transformer condition. A pilot workbench should preserve gas values, units, sampling dates, lab context, trend movement, and reviewer notes instead of flattening DGA into a single unexplained score.
GridAPM pilot use
Where this reference fits in the workbench.
GridAPM can help a utility pilot organize DGA evidence, surface missing context, draft review questions, and prepare evidence-pack language for engineer approval. The public site does not claim that GridAPM replaces the standard, diagnoses transformer condition, or issues final DGA conclusions.
Next steps
Connect the reference to a pilot workflow.
Use these links to move from standards context into evidence readiness, procurement, security, and pilot scoping.
FAQ
Standards language stays careful.
Does GridAPM implement IEEE C57.104 as a deterministic diagnostic engine?
The public website should not claim that. GridAPM can use DGA fields as pilot evidence and keep outputs reviewable by transformer engineers.
Can DGA evidence alone approve maintenance?
No. DGA should be reviewed with asset context, operating history, inspection findings, other tests, and qualified engineering judgment.